| .github/workflows | ||
| .gitlab | ||
| .run | ||
| api | ||
| assets | ||
| build/docker | ||
| cmd | ||
| deploy | ||
| docs | ||
| internal | ||
| pkg | ||
| protocols | ||
| testdata | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .gitlab-ci.yml | ||
| .golangci.yml | ||
| .goreleaser.yml | ||
| .pre-commit-config.yaml | ||
| config-container.yaml | ||
| config.yaml | ||
| go.mod | ||
| go.sum | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
| Taskfile.yml | ||
INetMock
INetMock is kind of a fork of INetSim. "Kind of" in terms that both applications overlap in their functionality to serve as "fake internet" routers.
INetMock right now does not implement so many protocols like INetSim. In fact it is only able to respond to HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, DNS-over-TLS (DoT) requests and to act as an HTTP proxy. The most notable advantage of INetMOck over INetSim is that it issues proper TLS certificates on the fly signed by a CA certificate that can be deployed to client systems to achieve "proper" TLS encryption - as long as the client does not use certificate pinning or something similar.
A second advantage is that INetMock is a complete rewrite in Go. It has a way smaller memory footprint and far better
startup and shutdown times. It also does not enforce root privileges as it is also possible to run the application
with the required capabilities to open ports e.g. with SystemD (a sample unit file can be found in the deploy/
directory).
This project is still heavy work-in-progress. There may be breaking changes at any time. There's no guarantee for anything except no kittens will be harmed!
Docs
Docs are available either in the docs/ directory or as rendered markdown book at
the GitHub pages.
Contribution/feature requests
Please create an issue for any proposal, feature requests, found bug,... I'm glad for every kind of feedback!
Right now I've no special workflow for pull requests but I will look into every proposed change.